Njord Explores The Intersection of Fuel EU Maritime & Wind Assisted Propulsion Systems  

Hosted by Frederik Pind, Managing Director at Njord, a green technology entity collaboratively founded by Cargill, Mitsui, and Maersk Tankers.

This January 2025 live event navigates the intersection of FuelEU Maritime regulations and Wind-Assisted Propulsion Systems (WAPS).

Discussions highlight compliance through efficiency, bringing together key industry voices to explore financial benefits, regulatory drivers, and practical strategies.

Kate Foster
Senior Freight Trader, Maersk Tankers
Kate brings over 20 years of maritime experience, combining expertise in EU ETS compliance and business case modelling for green regulations. She also collaborates with the Maersk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping.

Gavin Allwright
Secretary General, International Windship Association (IWSA)
Leading a 200-member organisation, Gavin offers insights on regulatory trends, wind propulsion technologies, and their adoption within the maritime sector.

Jonas Rasmussen
Client Director, Njord
Jonas specialises in maritime energy efficiency with over a decade of experience advising on technologies like WAPS, delivering insights into business case development.

Gain actionable insights by watching the session recording below, which provides:

-Practical strategies for FuelEU Maritime compliance.
-A comparative analysis of wind propulsion technologies.
-Examples of fleet-wide adoption and ROI case studies.

Five Takeaways

1. FuelEU Maritime as a Catalyst
FuelEU Maritime’s regulatory framework has become a launchpad for integrating wind propulsion technologies into commercial operations, helping shipowners reduce penalties while gaining financial and environmental rewards. Gavin Allwright explained, "FuelEU Maritime is designed to encourage not just compliance but innovation. By rewarding auxiliary technologies like wind propulsion with direct carbon intensity reductions, it offers shipowners both environmental and financial benefits. We've seen this shift push WAPS from a niche to a mainstream investment for many fleets."

2. Business Case Development
Return on Investment for WAPS can fall below five years, particularly for EU-trading vessels. Jonas Rasmussen shared, "We’ve seen specific examples where adjusting trading patterns in alignment with FuelEU incentives reduced ROI to under five years, making these investments more attractive to shipowners."

3. Technology Selection
Rotor sails, suction wings, and rigid sails dominate the market, with decisions tailored to vessel trading patterns and operational needs. Kate Foster emphasised, "It’s critical to match the technology to operational profiles, as seen in Maersk Tankers’ decision to choose suction sails due to air draft restrictions in their trading routes."

4. Crew and Operational Alignment
The transition to WAPS requires operational shifts and crew engagement. Gavin Allwright explained, "Crew buy-in is essential. While many systems are automated, operational adjustments such as navigation or mooring practices are inevitable and must be anticipated."

5. Global Implications
While currently regional, FuelEU Maritime may inspire similar frameworks globally. Kate Foster remarked, "The introduction of IMO midterm measures could amplify the business case for WAPS further, with global standards driving broader adoption and deeper reductions in greenhouse gas emissions."

Key Insights

The LinkedIn Live Event showcases the depth of expertise and collaboration required to navigate the complexities of FuelEU Maritime and WAPS adoption.

As Frederik summarises, "We hope today’s session provides a clear picture of how wind-assisted propulsion systems are incentivised under FuelEU Maritime and the steps required to integrate these technologies effectively. From exploring business cases to highlighting global trends, the discussion underscores the importance of both innovation and cooperation in meeting decarbonisation targets."

The session reinforces that while challenges remain, regulatory frameworks like FuelEU Maritime are already driving measurable change. By leveraging tailored technologies, fostering partnerships, and focusing on crew training, the maritime industry charts a sustainable path forward.

Your Questions, Our Insights

Top Audience Questions &
Key Takeaways

Need tailored guidance to
optimise your fleet?

Let’s talk.
contact us
contact us
Why do RFNBO fuels receive a 2x multiplier, but wind only receives a maximum of 5% reward?
From a strictly commercial standpoint, how can wind-assisted propulsion technologies contribute to tangible benefits like reduced port dues, priority berthing, or other financial incentives?
How could/should FEUM be strengthened (as the review process is starting)?
Do we have any statistics on how many ships with WAP systems have been installed, the average fuel savings, and the ROI?
How can freight contracts (including CPs) be adapted to fairly assess and reward WAP contributions?
Are there initiatives for WAPS adopters to pool and share performance data, and how can smaller shipowners benefit?
What are the penalties for non-compliance with FEUM standards, and how are they enforced?
What partnerships or collaborations can help scale WAPS adoption?
What are the trends observed in WAPS insurance coverage?
How do we see other regions adopting similar regulations?
What kind of guarantees should shipowners expect from WAPS makers?
Some training is required for the seafarers in order to adapt to the new reality. Some of the vessels are understaffed and many of them have a lot of manual work to do. I have seen these things myself while sailing; it is not just about putting the system on and that's all.
In light of FEUM, will the actual effect of sails just be theoretically assessed, or will this be estimated by performing something like a VTI (Vessel Technical Index) analysis based on weather normalization using accurately measured wave/current/STW/wind data?